The Mainstreaming of Design?

May 1, 2005
/ Print / Reprints /
ShareMore
/ Text Size+

The Mainstreaming of Design?
Jennifer Acevedo, Editor-in-Chief
Shortly after I accepted the editor’s position on BRANDPACKAGING, I had the opportunity to attend a web seminar presented by management guru Tom Peters and Saatchi & Saatchi’s Kevin Richards. During the seminar, titled “Lovemarks by Design”, both lamented the fact that, at the time, not one leading business school in the United States required a single course in the areas of innovation, creativity or design.
It’s been a quick six months, and, apparently, times have changed. Stanford University recently unveiled plans for its new “d.school”, which decries (in a manifesto printed on a cocktail napkin) that it will “use DESIGN thinking to inspire multidisciplinary teams.” A core team of faculty from computer science, mechanical engineering, management science and engineering, and, yes, the graduate school of business are collaborating to create the d.school. The Illinois Institute of Technology’s Institute of Design has undertaken a similar effort, albeit on a smaller scale, and now offers “non-designers” an executive master’s degree program in design methods.
So what does this changing attitude toward design mean for brand marketers? These days, I frequently hear warnings of the “commoditization” of design. Some seem to fear an economy in which design is a given, an expectation that consumers take for granted. Has another point of differentiation been lost?
I choose not to see it that way. With an expectation of design comes an appreciation and acknowledgement of good design. Consider the creative and often revolutionary packages we feature in the pages of this magazine each month—each has won with consumers because of unsurpassed shelf appeal, structural innovation or improved consumer utility. For both the brand marketer, whose eyes are opening to design-based strategy, and the consumer, who is drawn to the innovative in a sea of sameness, this so-called “mainstreaming” of design is a win-win proposition.
On another note, I’d like to acknowledge three companies who were instrumental in helping us add a point of difference to our own May/June cover. Thanks for a job well done go out to Kurz Transfer Products for providing the foil materials, H&M for supplying the dies and Letterhead Press for hot stamping the pre-printed covers.

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to BRAND PACKAGING Magazine. 

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

10th Annual Packaging That Sells Conference, Chicago, October 2012

Posted Date: October 29, 2013

BRANDPACKAGING’s packaging conference returned for a tenth year with a focus on a single message: Make It Matter.

Brand Packaging Magazine

brandpackaging cover story

July 2014

 The July 2014 issue features the latest on eye-tracking.  You can also read the issue at the Digital Editions.

Table Of Contents Subscribe

THE BRAND PACKAGING STORE

BP_DG_2013Cover.gif
Design Gallery Volume 11

Design Gallery Volume 11 is not just a study in good design. It’s a look at how packaging can successfully demonstrate structural and graphic innovation, make strong shelf impact, meet consumer, shopper and retailer needs and support and convey the brand story

More Products

SDG

STAY CONNECTED

facebook_40.png twitter_40px.png  youtube_40px.pnglinkedin_40px.pnggoogle plus